Search found 433 matches
- Thu Mar 28, 2024 11:25 am
- Forum: Image Processing Troubleshooting
- Topic: Donut stars
- Replies: 41
- Views: 863
Re: Donut stars
Oh, I think, I have a run :lol: :oops: Last post for today. But I would like to go back to my first diagram. Maybe it's clearer now what is depicted: These two curves are the stretches produced by the old beta and the new beta version. Everything else was identical: the image and the processing. Sam...
- Thu Mar 28, 2024 11:08 am
- Forum: Image Processing Troubleshooting
- Topic: Donut stars
- Replies: 41
- Views: 863
Re: Donut stars
One addition: Here's a screenshot of the stretching tool that FITSWork offers: 2024-03-28 11_47_44-Fitswork.jpg My understanding is, that OptiDev works likewise, but the points are calculated, like Ivo described. The curve is interpolated between the points. And while the old beta used 4096 points t...
- Thu Mar 28, 2024 9:01 am
- Forum: Image Processing Troubleshooting
- Topic: Donut stars
- Replies: 41
- Views: 863
Re: Donut stars
and thus the scale of the stretch is such that it would likely be hard to discern the minor fluctuations around regions of detail [...]. Maybe? I wonder if zooming in to a more narrow region would reveal adjustments made away from smooth curving. I don't think so. :think: My example delivered about...
- Thu Mar 28, 2024 8:22 am
- Forum: Image Processing Troubleshooting
- Topic: Donut stars
- Replies: 41
- Views: 863
Re: Donut stars
But, I need some help understanding what we are looking at. :think: You said there's a comparison of pixel mapping per file, resulting in....? :confusion-shrug: It's quite simple, I probably just messed up the explanation. The word 'comparision' I used is simply wrong in this context, sorry. So yes...
- Wed Mar 27, 2024 3:37 pm
- Forum: Image Processing Troubleshooting
- Topic: Donut stars
- Replies: 41
- Views: 863
Re: Donut stars
Hi all, I was not sure about posting this here in Ron’s thread, but I think I can add some points with reference. I hope that’s OK, Ron. This is a very early stage (aka: a quick hack), but I already want to share. I wrote a small tool (once again ;-) ) that should help us analyzing OptiDev’s behavio...
- Sun Mar 24, 2024 9:56 pm
- Forum: Image Processing Troubleshooting
- Topic: Donut stars
- Replies: 41
- Views: 863
Re: Donut stars
Dietmar, I started trying to write out how our different analogies could point in the same direction, but I got stuck because I don't think I understand how it works Hi Ron, that's my problem as well. There's something Ivo wrote, that I do not understand (as I wrote in my reply to Ivo). Maybe Ivo w...
- Sun Mar 24, 2024 5:26 pm
- Forum: Image Processing Troubleshooting
- Topic: Donut stars
- Replies: 41
- Views: 863
Re: Donut stars
Take the notion of decreasing the resolution of the curve to the absurd extreme and give it just one bit. Now every pixel in the 'stretched' image will either be On or Off and (obviously) all the detail in the original data is lost. Thanks, Ron. This is probably not my day. :( Ivo wrote "the amount...
- Sun Mar 24, 2024 3:10 pm
- Forum: Image Processing Troubleshooting
- Topic: Donut stars
- Replies: 41
- Views: 863
Re: Donut stars
But really this pops up across a large cohort, with many different optics, sensors, and stackers. I would assume the same. But I cannot prove, of course. And Ivo's testsets don't seem to be affected that much, as he wrote. I wonder if it would be helpful to reread some older threads to identify som...
- Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:03 am
- Forum: Image Processing Troubleshooting
- Topic: Donut stars
- Replies: 41
- Views: 863
Re: Donut stars
Dietmar I was curious what you used to create the profile viewer app? At first I was thinking that adding a checkbox or toggle button to set TopMost on the form would be handy, so that we could watch the profile change as we altered stretching parameters. But, the viewer doesn't react to live chang...
- Sat Mar 23, 2024 9:47 am
- Forum: Image Processing Troubleshooting
- Topic: Donut stars
- Replies: 41
- Views: 863
Re: Donut stars
Yes, it seems only two distinct values are assigned to the core regions of bright stars. The max value to the 'inner core' and then just one slightly lower value out for a distance surrounding it. The max value of the inner core is caused by saturation in your and in my example. But for non-saturat...