Page 1 of 1
1_1_122 wavelet slower than 1_1_118?
Posted: Wed Sep 14, 2011 8:36 pm
by cybereye
Ivo,
I've tried using wavelets in version 1_1_122 but it appears to take longer to run than in version 1_1_118 of StarTools? Is this your experience?
Cheers,
Mario
Re: 1_1_122 wavelet slower than 1_1_118?
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2011 4:01 am
by admin
cybereye wrote:Ivo,
I've tried using wavelets in version 1_1_122 but it appears to take longer to run than in version 1_1_118 of StarTools? Is this your experience?
Cheers,
Mario
Hi Mario,
Yes, you are correct. The Wavelet tool has been revamped with a new (but more CPU intensive) algorithm that should give much improved results over standard Wavelet sharpening algorithms.
The new algorithm should be much more instrumental in bringing out multi-scale detail, while greatly reducing ringing artifacts and completely avoiding clipping.
There is some optimization to be done yet on the new algorithm, so I expect things to improve over time.
Do let me know what you think!
Re: 1_1_122 wavelet slower than 1_1_118?
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 3:40 am
by admin
Hi Mario,
1.1.125 now incorporates an optimized version of the new Wavelet algorithm.
Cheers,