Using Heal to process stars and background independently

Guides, tutorials, tips & tricks.
Post Reply
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 2331
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 10:51 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Using Heal to process stars and background independently

Post by admin »

Let's say we have this image here;
Miquel_Heart_PreLife_Post2_crop.jpg
Miquel_Heart_PreLife_Post2_crop.jpg (58.82 KiB) Viewed 15737 times
Let's create a star mask that Heal can use to heal out the stars; (Mask, Auto, Stars, set 'Exclude Color' to 'Red' so that it won't select much of the nebula);
img_129.png
img_129.png (407.03 KiB) Viewed 15737 times
Now run the Heal module, but make sure you set 'New darker than old' to 'Yes'. What this does is guarantee that replacement pixels for the stars are always darker than the stars themselves;
img_130.png
img_130.png (331.95 KiB) Viewed 15737 times
'Keep' the result and save the healed image for future reference. Now reset the mask (Clear, Invert) and launch the Layer module.
In the Layer module, click Undo->Bg. This will set the background to what's in the undo buffer (which is the original image).
Now set Layer Mode to 'Subtract' and voilà! We have perfectly extracted the stars;
img_131.png
img_131.png (682.37 KiB) Viewed 15737 times
Save the star field - we'll need it later to layer it back in.
Click 'Undo' to restore the background-only image.
Now let's have some fun with the background!
For example, let's do some wavelet sharpening of the larger scale details;
img_132.png
img_132.png (350.42 KiB) Viewed 15737 times
There's plenty more we could do (Life, Wavlet Denoise, HDR, etc.) but for the purpose of this demo this is enough.
Once we're happy with our new background, all we need to do now is layer the stars back in.
Launch the Layer module, click Open, locate and load the stars-only image.
All we need to do now is simply 'Add' the stars back to the background. And Bob's our (proverbial) uncle!
img_133.png
img_133.png (706.96 KiB) Viewed 15737 times
Note that stars may be slightly blow out in places where nebula+starlight exceeds unity (= pure white). This should be fairly minimal, but if that is a concern to you, set 'Cap Mode' to 'Normalize'.
Miquel_Heart_PreLife_Post2_crop_bg_new.jpg
Miquel_Heart_PreLife_Post2_crop_bg_new.jpg (60.56 KiB) Viewed 15737 times
Ivo Jager
StarTools creator and astronomy enthusiast
mcbbcn
Posts: 61
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 4:28 am

Re: Using Heal to process stars and background independently

Post by mcbbcn »

Very awesome! Now, we have a great chance to accentuate those stars without over saturating the whole image. Thanks for putting together this guide! :bow-yellow:
torsinadoc
Posts: 44
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:58 pm

Re: Using Heal to process stars and background independently

Post by torsinadoc »

very nice. Just tried it. I really like the ability to separate the stars on wide field views
mcbbcn
Posts: 61
Joined: Sat Nov 24, 2012 4:28 am

Re: Using Heal to process stars and background independently

Post by mcbbcn »

torsinadoc wrote:very nice. Just tried it. I really like the ability to separate the stars on wide field views
Yes, it's a fantastic tool! :obscene-drinkingcheers:
User avatar
Cheman
Posts: 354
Joined: Tue Aug 20, 2013 11:20 pm
Location: Gardnerville Nevada, USA
Contact:

Re: Using Heal to process stars and background independently

Post by Cheman »

Awesome. I will print this out and add it to my Startools how to binder. I really like these step by step instructions. Easier to follow for me than the vids. Keep 'em comming.
Che
akeru
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 9:59 pm
Location: Madrid, Spain
Contact:

Re: Using Heal to process stars and background independently

Post by akeru »

Hi all. Heal is a very powerfull function but I have a question. Why heal is unavailable with the tracking enabled?
And if I work with heal due to separate stars and nebula and later I add the different layers in a only image again ¿Must I activate tracking again? It had impact in the noise reduction process?

Thanks a lot.

Roberto.
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 2331
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 10:51 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: Using Heal to process stars and background independently

Post by admin »

akeru wrote:Hi all. Heal is a very powerfull function but I have a question. Why heal is unavailable with the tracking enabled?
And if I work with heal due to separate stars and nebula and later I add the different layers in a only image again ¿Must I activate tracking again? It had impact in the noise reduction process?

Thanks a lot.

Roberto.
Yes, you're right. Heal (along with a couple of other modules) is unavailable while Tracking is enabled as it will (presently) greatly interfere with the continuous data analysis that Tracking performs. The reason for that is that Heal obviously 'makes up' data, for which no prior analysis exists (there is no record of its evolution). I have a fix for this, but it will require a fair bit of work (it's something for the next major release).

For the exact same reason, the Layer module will warn you to be very careful if Tracking is still on - it can make Tracking 'lose track' of signal evolution in your data.

Once Tracking is switched off, analysis is no longer possible, so, unfortunately, using Heal after switching Tracking back on will not help.
Ivo Jager
StarTools creator and astronomy enthusiast
Burly
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 7:06 am
Location: Northamptonshie uk

Re: Using Heal to process stars and background independently

Post by Burly »

lost me here ivo save to where how?- Save the star field - we'll need it later to layer it back in.
Rkonrad
Posts: 202
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 2:55 am

Re: Using Heal to process stars and background independently

Post by Rkonrad »

Hi Dave,

I've made a quick video. Does this make more sense to you? https://youtu.be/x2tBFwt-SeM

Cheers Richard
Burly
Posts: 236
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 7:06 am
Location: Northamptonshie uk

Re: Using Heal to process stars and background independently

Post by Burly »

Rkonrad wrote:Hi Dave,

I've made a quick video. Does this make more sense to you? https://youtu.be/x2tBFwt-SeM

Cheers Richard
Thanks Richard I will take a look of that this evening
Post Reply