Messier 4 Rasa 8" ZWO ASI071 MC Pro

User images created with StarTools.
Post Reply
Topographic
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2019 5:58 pm

Messier 4 Rasa 8" ZWO ASI071 MC Pro

Post by Topographic »

This is my first effort with my RASA and the ASI 071.
Lights 100x$0s
Darks 100
Flats/DFlats 20
Bortle 3 (rural France)
Gain 95
Temp -5
APT

Ivo, I would be grateful if you could assess the data and processing (feel free to have a go yourself :) )

Anyone else want to play, feel free.


https://www.dropbox.com/sh/xz8y3wmw454s ... KuWLa?dl=0

https://www.astrobin.com/9hs564/
Attachments
M4.jpg
M4.jpg (416.59 KiB) Viewed 1623 times
Topographic
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2019 5:58 pm

Re: Messier 4 Rasa 8" ZWO ASI071 MC Pro

Post by Topographic »

Tried again.

This time I used the 'Sample' method for colour.

Which do people think is better or prefer?

David
M4 Sample.jpg
M4 Sample.jpg (414 KiB) Viewed 1608 times
Burly
Posts: 248
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 7:06 am
Location: Northamptonshie uk

Re: Messier 4 Rasa 8" ZWO ASI071 MC Pro

Post by Burly »

Sample image for me , very nice image indeed loads of colour, I will have a play with your data when I get a minute .
Topographic
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2019 5:58 pm

Re: Messier 4 Rasa 8" ZWO ASI071 MC Pro

Post by Topographic »

Burly

Thanks, I lean that way too. If you have a play if you post it I would be grateful if you could include a copy of thelog. It all helps with the learning process

Cheers

David
User avatar
admin
Site Admin
Posts: 2501
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 10:51 pm
Location: Melbourne
Contact:

Re: Messier 4 Rasa 8" ZWO ASI071 MC Pro

Post by admin »

For accuracy, I'd say your initial image is more accurate.
M4 is old, meaning it has an overabundance of older stars yellow/red stars (indeed, it is home to many white dwarfs), given that any bright blue giants would have long expired. So, a yellower appearance of the cluster is to be expected.

As is the case with many OSCs., your ASI-071 shows an increased green response in the higher wavelength, which tends to make things more yellow. This is hard/impossible to balance out. The solution is to use a luminance filter (aka IR/UV filter) that cuts this response before it increases again.
I can't quite tell whether you used such a filter here, as the yellowing does not appear to be too bad compared to some other instruments having the same quirk/feature. However, the foreground (random) star field should exhibit a good random distribution of star colors, but is IMHO comparatively lacking in blue stars a little with an over-abundance of orange stars, providing some anecdotal (not conclusive) evidence that there a slight yellow bias. At the end of the day, just increasing the blue bias from the default color balance goes a long way I think, arriving at something in between the two images you posted.
Autosave001(3).jpg
Autosave001(3).jpg (494.89 KiB) Viewed 1554 times
Hope this helps at all!
Ivo Jager
StarTools creator and astronomy enthusiast
Burly
Posts: 248
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 7:06 am
Location: Northamptonshie uk

Re: Messier 4 Rasa 8" ZWO ASI071 MC Pro

Post by Burly »

Do you have the original fits file not the tiff
alacant
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 7:03 am

Re: Messier 4 Rasa 8" ZWO ASI071 MC Pro

Post by alacant »

Hi
Lovely shot.
I went low key; I have a thing with orange stars in globular clusters!
Cheers
m4
Topographic
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2019 5:58 pm

Re: Messier 4 Rasa 8" ZWO ASI071 MC Pro

Post by Topographic »

Burly wrote:Do you have the original fits file not the tiff
Burly

I just noticed this....or I don't remember responding :lol:

the autosave fit is in dropbox

David
Post Reply